Apocalypse. . . when?

“I have even had dreams”

Christian apocalypticism seems to be running rampant in contemporary Western culture. Christians and curious others spend millions of dollars each year for the next book by John Hagee, Tim LaHaye, Pat Robertson, Harold Camping or the like.  Christian preachers all around the globe warn of a divine judgment to befall the entire planet in the near, very near future. Lovely little old women and bored old men see signs of things to come around every corner, just as they have for countless generations. Even in daily conversations, echoes of “burn in hell”,” judgment day is coming” and “one day you’ll see, but then it will be too late” ooze through western culture like an overflowing sewer. Torturous, grueling and sometimes graphically described fantasies of pain and torment are often projected on to those who dare to question the legitimacy of the bearer of this so-called “news” of divine judgment.

So, exactly what is Christian apocalypticism, where did it come from and why does it seem pervasive in our culture? Let’s start by looking at the roots of apocalypticism.

Around the turn of the second century BCE, in a geographical locale known as Yehud, later to become Judea and then Palestine, was the city of Jerusalem, the religious-political center of the Yehudim, the Jews. This local traditional culture was being influenced by a burgeoning and dominant Hellenistic culture following on the boot-heels of Alexander the Great. As had always been the case, economically minded and influential Yehudim were often attracted to the social and monetary benefits of assimilating into this wide-reaching and successful culture. More traditional, “Torah observant” members who called themselves the Hasidim, saw this as not only an affront to their society, but to their heritage, to their lineage and most importantly, to their deity.

Around 198 BCE, control of the territory including Yehud was lost by the Ptolemies of Egypt to the south, and became a province of the Seleucid kingdom of Syria to the north. The Seleucids pressed their Hellenistic influence on their territories.

In the third quarter of the second century BCE, The king Antiochus IV Epiphanes invaded Jerusalem. During his visits, he defiled and ravaged the Temple, taking whatever he wanted, setting up a representation of Zeus and offering swine on the sacred altar of the Jerusalem Temple.

And entered proudly into the sanctuary, and took away the golden altar, and the candlestick of light, and all the vessels thereof  And the table of the shewbread, and the pouring vessels, and the vials, and the censers of gold, and the veil, and the crown, and the golden ornaments that were before the temple, all which he pulled off.  He took also the silver and the gold, and the precious vessels: also he took the hidden treasures which he found.  Taking all this, he went back to his own country, after he had spoken with great arrogance and shed much blood.” (I Mac. 1:21-24)

“Two years later, the king sent the Mysian commander to the cities of Judah, and he came to Jerusalem with a strong force. He spoke to them deceitfully in peaceful terms, and won their trust. Then he attacked the city suddenly, in a great onslaught, and destroyed many of the people in Israel. He plundered the city and set fire to it, demolished its houses and its surrounding walls, took captive the women and children, and seized the cattle.”(I Mac. 1:29-32)

Antiochus issued a decree that “all should be one people, each abandoning his particular customs”(I Mac. 41b-42a) Observance of Torah was outlawed under penalty of death.  Those caught with a Torah scroll were executed.   Circumcision was forbidden.  “Women who had their children circumcised were put to death, in keeping with the decree, with the babies hung from their necks; their families also and those who had circumcised them were killed.”(I Mac. 1:60-61)

The traditional belief of the Jews was that all was of God.  Everything was under his control, both good and evil.  “I form the light, and create darkness; I make peace, and create evil; I am the LORD, that doeth all these things.” (Isaiah 45:7 – JPS)  If, according to their beliefs, they were obedient to God, they should prosper and succeed. If they were disobedient to God, they should fail and suffer. This was their traditional teaching passed down through their holy scriptures known as Deuteronomistic Theology. The fall of Israel in 722 BCE and their own destruction in 587 at the hands of the Babylonians was understood through the eyes of destruction due to disobedience. In the second century BCE, this “theodicy” or “defense of God’s goodness and omnipotence in view of the existence of evil” did not reflect their real-world experience. They were not being punished because they were being disobedient; they were being punished because they were being obedient. This is where the rubber of mythology meets the road of reality.

From this altered state of reality emerged a sectarian world-view and literary genre known today as apocalypticism, from the Greek verb ‘apocalyptein’ meaning “uncover” or “reveal”. The noun is ‘apocalypsis’ and hence the English word apocalypse.  Apocalyptics believed that God had “revealed” a new reality to them.

In an apocalyptic writing, (an apocalypse, revealing or revelation) insights into the past, present and future are “revealed” to a seer of a vision. These visions will often be revealed by a divine being. The imagery of the vision can be impossible for the seer to understand, so the divine being will provide clarification. The seers of these pseudonymous writings are often former heroes of ancient Israel. Cosmic events of the future for the long-dead seer more accurately relay earthly trials and events of the author’s own time. Typically the ‘end times’ of the future predictions correlate with the present time of the author/audience.

One early such apocalypse is known as “The Book of the Watchers”, found in I Enoch. Enoch was the mythical son of Jared, the father of Methuselah and great-grandfather of Noah. Hebrew legend told that Enoch had not died, but was one of the two people taken up to heaven by God. Enoch was the supposed seer of the visions in I Enoch.

The Book of the Watchers describes visions of heaven and earth before the flood of Noah. It draws from a small passage of scripture found only in Genesis 6 regarding the ben elohim or sons of God and the nephilim. The sons of God are described as stars and angels who rebelled against God and mated with earth women, because, as we all know, earth girls are easy, and hot !!

The leader of this cosmic rebellion was known as Semyaz and Azaz’el. This fictional character would later be used as the model for the christian Satan.   As a result of this extra-terrestrial vaginal invasion, these rebels are tossed out of heaven and into a pit under the earth.  The pit would become the Christian Hell. The offspring of these divine creatures grew to be giants who dominated humanity and provided them with tools which brought war and destruction (The Hellenistic influence is evident by comparing the legend of Prometheus). God imprisoned these evil forces and sent the flood to destroy this corrupted world. (One wonders why God chose to destroy all of mankind instead of just destroying the evil forces, rather than simply imprisoning them)

Anyway… I Enoch was redacted and modified over the next few centuries, likely to reflect paradigm shifts within the culture.  It was a very popular book in early Christianity, but was ultimately identified as heresy, blacklisted and almost forgotten.  Fortunately, English translations can now be found in many book stores and libraries.

This apocalyptic literary genre was common from the second century BCE into the second century CE, thriving at times of intense persecution.  As outdated cultures die out, those clinging to the archaic views often go into the darkness kicking and clawing.   Several such writings are available today in translated form. The biblical canon contains two such writings, but those only scratch the surface of apocalyptic writing. Early New Testament authors were apocalypticists, but not the only apocalypticists. A portion of the book of Daniel contains apocalyptic visions written against Antiochus Epiphanes and those who were swayed by Greek influence. The Apocalypse of John was written against the Roman Empire and those who were swayed by its influence.

One of the primary literary devices of apocalyptic writing is abstract imagery, often very convoluted and difficult to understand for modern readers, but it would have been clearly understood by the audience of the author’s culture since it drew from mythologies familiar to contemporary readers and listeners.  One of the advantages of apocalyptic interpreters is the ability to transfer or project current people, events or circumstances on to those otherwise unclear scenarios.

The problem with apocalyptic thought is that it is always a complete and utter failure. The Maccabeans successfully ousted the Seleucids to establish their kingdom of YHWH but the corruption within their own culture brought in the Roman empire to settle a dispute that, well, didn’t really work out well at all for the Yehudim. In the early Common Era, the Roman Empire wasn’t defeated by the “Army of God”; the Army of God was squashed like a bug under the heels of the overwhelming might of the Romans.  Years later the Roman Empire would become the Army of God, but that’s another Constantinian story for another Constantinian time.

Ever since the earliest days of Christianity, these apocalyptic judgments have been looming “just around the corner”. One can go to any point in Christian history and find someone, somewhere crying “The End is Near!” Yet society continues to grow, sometimes faster than others, cultures continue to change and evolve, and the apocalypticists continue their warnings of impending doom.

As Christianity continues to be de-mythologized by science, history, cosmology, archaeology, biology, geology, paleontology and every other -ology imaginable, except perhaps cosmetology, those who feel the most marginalized, the most embarrassed and those left standing in the feces of their own ignorance, will be the ones who cry the loudest.

As we learn more and more about this wonderful world we share, the only thing doomed is apocalyptic thought.



9 thoughts on “Apocalypse. . . when?

  1. Hello X,

    Interesting reads,you’ve done your homework on this subject. To me this is “The crux of the biscuit” (Frank Zappa) concerning the ‘doom sayers’ of today:

    “One of the primary literary devices of apocalyptic writing is abstract imagery, often very convoluted and difficult to understand for modern readers, but it would have been clearly understood by the audience of the author’s culture since it drew from mythologies familiar to contemporary readers and listeners. One of the advantages of apocalyptic interpreters is the ability to transfer or project current people, events or circumstances on to those otherwise unclear scenarios.”

    Reader/audience relevance always need to be taken into consideration,something those steeped in “Darbyism” today sorely miss.

    Posted by senecus | July 19, 2011, 10:53 pm
    • Hey Senecus,

      Thanks for spending a lil time with me.

      I agree with you regarding historical relevance. And, I propose that this makes the literature more meaningful and fascinating as well. It makes it real.

      I’ve just read a new book titled “The Rise and Fall of the Bible” by Timothy Beal. In it he states that while biblical consumerism has never been higher, biblical literacy has never been lower. I find that to be an interesting dichotomy. Ya think he knows the same people that we know?

      Posted by Xcntrik | July 20, 2011, 12:29 am
      • HaHa!!

        I would venture to say if not the same people ,then their preacher/churches.

        I read some reviews of the book,going on my “to read” list. As for lack of biblical literacy is concerned ,I’ve bemoaned it for years – including on the pages of Topix-as you may have witnessed. That’s not always well received by the ‘faithful’. It’s why I recently posted (and was thrown under the bus for) why I like when you or others who may have a “differing/opposing view” come to “Christian threads”. It Should cause one (believer) to seek greater understanding of contextualised scriptural events,instead of responding by rote. The ol’ “iron sharpens iron”.

        To me what I see the Bible becoming(has become?) mere prop, another accessory in the “Club of Churchianity”.

        Posted by senecus | August 4, 2011, 3:38 pm
  2. Well Harold Camping’s (Cramping… good one!) Rapture came and went and noone was caught up, no one saw the Lord In the Air, there were no earthquakes, in short NOTHING he predicted came to pass!!!

    I expect the Mayan Calendar to run out in much the same way.

    Ain’t going to be no apocalypse unless an unscheduled asteroid were to hit, or we bring it upon ourselves!

    Posted by Ed-M | May 22, 2011, 2:27 pm
  3. Absolutely fascinating stuff, X.

    I drops in here when I feels the need to think….

    Posted by Dearth of Couth | February 24, 2011, 2:12 pm
  4. In my own lifetime I have been warned several times of the Apocalypse. My earliest memories of this were in the 80s with the threat of nuclear war (to be immediately preceded by The Rapture [TM] of course). Several wars happened in the 90’s (and at least a few were supposed to start WW3). Then there was Y2K and its children. Now you can choose between Harold C[r]amping’s May 21, 2011 date and the Mayan 2012 (which I believe is a misunderstanding of Mayan beliefs, but I digress). Heck, I have my own apocalyptic belief. I believe the world will end on a Monday the 13th because Mondays have always been evil (even in Scripture God never said anything was good on Monday) so they scare me more than Fridays and Triskaidekaphobia is a common human ailment. But, if the world did truly end on a Friday the 13th, that seems appropriate too because millions would be looking forward to that weekend getaway from work and a chance to relax that would never come, and somehow the cruel irony of that seems most fitting. :)

    Posted by Byroniac | September 17, 2010, 11:47 pm
    • I think I kinda like your Monday the 13th scenario. It often seems that Monday morning is indeed the end of the world.

      BUT, if the world ended on a Friday that would be more poetic. You worked all week and just got paid. You’ve saved up a little money and you’re finally going to make the trip to Best Buy and get that new (fill in the blank) that you have been drooling over for at least six months. Then BAM, on the wings of clouds, here comes Quatzequatel.

      I can hear Erich Von Daniken saying, “I knew it, I was right! I tried to tell them but, no, they just wouldn’t listen. So, I was off by a year or so. Sue me.”

      Oh, BTW, the end is near, please sign over possession of your valuables to Xcntrik Enterprises, Inc. A Non-Prophet organization.

      Posted by xcntrik | September 19, 2010, 8:32 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: